The Case For Jahmyr Gibbs As The Fantasy Football 1.01

The Case For Jahmyr Gibbs As The Fantasy Football 1.01

Ian Hartitz breaks down the RB room for the Detroit Lions, and how Jahmyr Gibbs just might be the fantasy football 1.01.

Published

The production speaks for itself when it comes to Jahmyr Gibbs. In the past two seasons, he's compiled 3,768 scrimmage yards and 38 TDs. The highlights look like they're on 2X speed. He barely turned 24. Yup, tons of fantasy football drafts will have his name called first this summer. Ian Hartitz breaks it down as part of his Detroit Lions Team Preview.

Is Jahmyr Gibbs Mr. 1.01 in fantasy land?

Well, Fantasy Life's group of alleged fantasy experts is split 2x2 on the proposition! Mr. Dwain McFarland and I do indeed have Gibbs as fantasy's top overall pick, while Kendall Valenzuela is leaning with Bijan Robinson, and Mr. "I'm going to be different and show them" Matthew Freedman has Ja'Marr Chase.

Here's the four-pronged case for Gibbs:

  • We are potentially looking at the world's best real-life running back. I wouldn't blame anyone for rolling with Bijan or someone like Saquon Barkley or Jonathan Taylor; just realize Gibbs' career average of 5.4 yards per carry ranks fifth … ever … and he's also lethal as a pass-catcher (only Bijan and Christian McCaffrey have more receptions over the past three seasons).
  • This is one of the league's more fantasy-friendly offensive environments for an RB. Nobody has scored more points than the Lions over the past three seasons. Goff's immobility results in a ton of checkdowns (Lions RBs collectively rank seventh in targets since 2023). The scheme and offensive line have provided the third-most rushing yards *before* contact per carry since drafting Gibbs (and they were still 4th in a down 2025). Bringing in Petzing could even further help matters here considering he managed to produce the league's sixth-most efficient rushing offense in terms of EPA per designed rush while leading the Cardinals.
  • A true workhorse role is finally here. This was usually the one concern when debating Gibbs vs. Bijan or CMC in past years: The presence of Montgomery capped the projectable touch ceiling. Not anymore! Our fantasy football projections have only CMC (339), Bijan (338) and Taylor (333) seeing more total touches than Gibbs (327) this season. Gibbs has averaged an absurd 24.4 PPR points per game in 14 career contests with Montgomery playing under a third of the offense's snaps.
  • Gibbs remains smack dab in the middle of his prime. The 24-year-old talent is directly in the age range that has produced the most elite fantasy seasons at the position. Additionally, availability is the best ability, and Gibbs has played in 49 of a possible 51 regular-season games since entering the league.

Yes, Bijan is also an ultra-talented, three-down workhorse in the middle of his best years, but the difference in overall offensive firepower is what has me leaning Gibbs at the top of drafts. Fantasy Life team projections have the Lions ranked second in offensive touchdowns per game, while the Falcons rank … 21st.

Also note: Ex-Chiefs RB Isiah Pacheco is expected to be more of a true backup to Gibbs than what we saw from Montgomery over the years, but hey, it's possible the man who runs like the ground stole his lunch money is more involved than expected in short-yardage and/or goal-line situations. FLEX-worthy standalone value is unlikely either way; just realize the only competition at hand are NPC's Sione Vaki and Jacob Saylors. Pacheco would be on the cover of every waiver wire article in the industry if Gibbs were forced to miss time—he's one of fantasy football's best pure handcuff options.

Players Mentioned in this Article

  1. Jahmyr Gibbs
    JahmyrGibbs
    RBDETDET
    PPG
    19.2
    Proj
    320.9
  2. Bijan Robinson
    BijanRobinson
    RBATLATL
    PPG
    19.3
    Proj
    304.3
  3. Saquon Barkley
    SaquonBarkley
    RBPHIPHI
    PPG
    13.3
    Proj
    237.8
  4. Jonathan Taylor
    JonathanTaylor
    RBINDIND
    PPG
    19.7
    Proj
    281.4

Published